grad schools i wish i went to

1.) RISD
2.) YALE
3.) MICA
4.) CALARTS
5.)UC BERKELEY (PhD in Philos of Art and Perception)
6.) UCB MFA in Art

Nov 19 Yale Open House
Julie Wbd and I are going! Anyone want to join?

Mica Open House anyone?

I want to be Barbara Gladstone. In real life plz

The Fair

The lack of artists in this chapter is fitting, as artists have little to no idea what happens with the sales of art. The business side of art remains a serious mystery.

Wowwwww! I had no idea what went on with art once it left a studio. Literally no clue. This chapter revealed a lot about what happens to the works and who is really in charge of them once a sale is made. And once the works change hands, it never stops. The rotation of a collection and the constant sale and resale of works and bodies of work keep things popping. A little confused about the differences between dealer collector and speculator. Especially when dealers collect and artists become dealers and gallerists have collections. Then the dealer that started their own private collection opens up their own "private exhibition space" aka a gallery. I got a little lost in the terminology. But some good tips were given about selling work, selling yourself, and your work selling yourself and yourself selling work. maybe to the devil, but we'll talk about that later.

Once the art leaves the artists hands it's really out of the artists control as far as the cost, prestige of owner, and even meaning of the work is completely up for grabs. (I'm thinking lots of art gets grabbed and molested after it leaves the studio, a la Baldessari)

What is a speculator?

"You have to make new work to sell old work" This makes the deal less risky for investors, since they feel safer that the works already made are solidified and over. A sense of retrospect is seriously coveted within the art world. Once a moment has passed, collectors dealers historians and critics take years pouring over the details. It makes it hard to keep up with contemporary art. For me at least it is difficult when the modern art section is filled with dead artists.

"My art is almost unsellable." Is that because it doesn't cater to the market, and if it doesn't cater to the market does that mean it doesn't cater to viewers? Is it really a good thing to be unsellable?

"The amount of art in the world is a bit depressing."
agreed.

I think that when referring to Blum and Poe about the "too much dude", it might have been a comment about the lack of feminine perspective. The two seemed to more attribute this very characteristic to their success. Maybe I'm just being sensitive, but Thornton brought it up not me.

Hopefully now that I know what goes on in the art market I won't start catering to it in my creations. The safety of knowing that as long as I am ignorant to the business side of art then it will never be able to contaminate my work, leaves me feeling blissfully ignorant.

Damian Ortega CAPITAL less at Barbara Gladstone

Damián Ortega at Gladstone Gallery

Ordinary objects are typically used by Damian Ortega to project his interest in the mundane and everyday. This emphasis on one specific object creates a strong meeting, with a centralized idea and concept of what the true meaning of the object is. A simple object can become a powerful message when manipulated by Damian Ortega.

In Gladstone Gallery, his work is created with one simple material. Brick. I of course am always partial to brick. I like the appeal of the down-home southern charm, the old world essence of the material, and some of the nostalgic feelings it can stir up. Also, the solid nature of the material paired with its everyday architectural uses, can easily compose an unbending foundation. The solidarity of the material creates such a bold entrance and message in its structure, it is hard to take the work as anything but serious and sturdy.

The brick is created with intentional voids within the brick structures, scattered throughout the space. Not only does every structure stand far above a standard person's height, but Ortega created the bricks with voids from concrete blocks and brick by sanding them down.

All are titled "Building", and are a dwelling-like structure. It mimics not only the windows found in the NY stacked houses and buildings where people literally "live on top of each other", as well as mimicking Aztec dwellings of the past. Its a display of 5 structures that comprise a series of these dwellings, though they could just as easily be uninhabited.

As you learn more about Ortega you will realize that most work is political, as he started as a political cartoonist. The buildings are exactly that, political representations of poverty in brick form. The show's title," CAPITAL less" evokes the loss of captial. The loss is in the buildings its self, as they represent what once was a thriving structure, though it also represents a sections of the sociopolitical world in which the buildings are imaginarily situated. The buildings are paired with a video of a building in Sao Paulo Brazil, the Treme-Treme, which the video is entitled, that houses homeless occupants. The buildings are also for the capital less citizens of the city. The world play continues! Capital, as in city, refers to the loss of the city in which they once were a part of, and now live within what once was. The nostalgia continues as a capital remembered is lived in but continues to deplete into erosion.

The play on positive and negative space is used as a pun. And we all know how much I love word play. The space is positive shapes, made of negative space. The capital waste turns into a living space. The waste of the space is used as a place for homeless to dwell. It is a serious blunder on the city planning board's record, and this is Ortega's not so subtle way of rubbing it in their face with minimalist sophistication. These spaces come to represent the dilapidation of a structure, and the utilization of such a space. It is industrial and at the same time archaic.

In another sculpture, the inside of ventilation hoses are cast and displayed. An internal space is shown again, and exhibited as a form. The negative space turned into a positive one becomes a conversation with the other 5 pieces of buildings.

I am always completely enraptured by urban environments and all of the contradictory relationships within the atmosphere. The complications of life that arise in such an environment are often convoluted and thriving with positive and negative polarized views on the benefits and consequences of such a structure. Within art the perspective can be sociopolitical, architectural, and a range of confused expressionist representation. Any way you put it, an urban study is one that appeals to almost everyone, and can create a situation for ideal introspection of the structures of a society.

What do I like about it?

I like the minimal materials used

I like the clever show title

I like the ambiguous stance the work takes on the issue it raises

I like the subtlety

I like the simple and pure aesthetic

I like the concepts that come out of such a simple title and structure that provide endless meanings

I like that the introduction on Barbara Gladstone's Gallery makes for a nice segway into my next post about chapter 3...

7 Days in the Art World posts

Capter 6- The Studio Visit
"He's done some scholarly shit and some spectacular shows. It's money well spent- peanuts compared to what we've poured into favricating Oval."

"...our business is to sell symptoms articulated as objects"

Other paintings credit upwards of 35 names. Similarly, Murakami's desire to help his assistants launch their own careers is unusual.

"I like to see the artist's reality."

"I was taught that one o the defining premises of modern art was its antagonism to mass culture... If I wanted to be accepted more readily by the academic establishment, I could argue that Takashi is working within the system only to subvert it..."

What makes Takashi's art great- and also potentially scary- is his honest and completely canny relationship to commercial culture industries."

"it's not a gift shop- it's more like performance art"

it is interesting to see that for the studio visit Sarah Thornton has chosen one of the most successful and business-oriented artists in the industry. The issue of "selling out" is a serious overtone in this chapter.

Pricing and selling works seem as far away from the creative process as possible, but are a necessary component in the business side of the art world. This is a side that is often not revealed or talked about. It is nice to know that even Takashi Murakami has the same concerns and ideas about art business etiquette, and that he was ok with letting us take a peek into his studio to find out what is really going on.

It's also inspiring to know that the success of his assistants is a concern.



Chapter 2 - The Crit

"...Wheras acadmia is based on rational group-think. There is a magic and a n alchemy to art, but academics are always suspicious of the guy who stirs the big black pot."

Most schools turn a blind eye to the art market.

The art market simmers underneath all fo these schools.

Others occupy a left-wing position that believes the neo-avant garde should subvert the commerce of art.

The art world is like a western- full of cowboys, whores, and dandies."

It is a very simple, practical matter. For clear investigations, you need time. That is the only rule of thumb. if you don't have it, you run the risk of being superficial." "People had more to say."

"When there's nothing to sa, that becomes the question, in which case that's a really interesting conversation."

Interesting about how we can not learn about the art market, as if it were too tabboo. It's what we all want to know and learn- but can't learn from the institutions.

Afro Margin

Chris Ofili
Afro Margin
at David Zwirner

8 pencil drawings of sizes ranging around 3 x 2' in size. The drawings focus on vertically piled objects, which are Ofili's "afro heads", piled high on the page to make a vertical "totem pole".
The composition dominates in these drawings, the space broken by lines of these afro heads, and thus create the "margin".
Ofili has in the past used such afro heads to convey the common notion that ‘all black people look the same’.
All heads are made into distinctly different shapes and sizes by Ofili. In this exhibit the heads are less accentuated as black heads than in previous works, allowing the viewer to treat the structures as optical barriers and abstract objects. The compositional use of the structures allows for a stark visual contrast between the black and white spaces of the papers. The title of the show is a play on the meaning of marginalization. Margins are on the paper, as well as in the sociopolitical aspects of the work.

Tate Britain will have a mid-career retrospective of Chris Ofili's work in Jan 2010.

P.P.O.W.

Located on the 3rd floor of 511 West 25th Street
A cohesive show about the end of civilization and mutations of nature
all done in pencil drawing of course

George Boorujy

Migratory Drift

Sep 17-Oct 24, 2009

great show, great success

http://www.ppowgallery.com/

Interview with Jenna Totten

Jenna Totten is a painter from Mason Gross School of the Arts. This is our interview about her works, which can be found here.








J- In your work there is a lot of bodily mutation and mutilation. Who inspires your work?

T- call me a sick person but i enjoy mutilation and mutation, horror, gore so naturelly i ge inspired by horror films, No real artists in particular really. I look at Chet Zar, David Hartmen, and Stephen Gammel. but i feel i just really like their work and the subject matter more than using them for inspiration. but if i were to dig into my "psychy" a bit i struggled with my weight when i was younger so this hate for the pretty perfect human form kinda boiled, cooked,and fermented in my head for a while until it became something i enjoy seeing . being normal, seeing normal things are boring to me now.

J- Do you share the goals of these artists, or are you trying to represent a merging of

T- Since i dont really look to too many artists for inspiration i try to do my own thing based on random objects and concepts i come across and i mutilate them in my head and try to make it a visual reality in my work.


J- Do you want to modify the way that pop culture represents the bodily deformations in monsters? Do you feel that you are humanizing it or removing the disgust factor? More specifically, why do your works represent bodily horror with such fun interesting patterns and colors?

T-well i like said earlier springs from my younger years of being overweight and in my teen angst it kind of just developed into this horror-esk style of purples and neon greens and so on. because really i'm not all decay and grim misery i like color too. and the bright colors bring a sort of irony to my work thats kind of corky and funny.


J- Do you recreate the characters or modify their personality or do you use their existing images and associated connotations to formulate new meanings?

T- the last one, haha. i believe your talking about my series of horror film characters in the psychedelic background. those paintings were really just for fun and some what an experiment in creating my own kind of pop art if you will .


J-What attracts you to abstract backgrounds with detached heads? Is this a decapitation or simply a void in the figure ground relationship to create a floating effect?

T- honestly there is not pre-thinking to the pieces you are referring to. but i was playing with irony a bit but i believe that our minds are more powerful that we believe that our bodies are just a vessel sort to speak.